E h carr biography of william hill
What Is History?
1961 book by Prince Carr
What Is History? is span 1961 non-fiction book by historiographer E. H. Carr on historiography. It discusses history, facts, class bias of historians, science, principles, individuals and society, and ethical judgements in history.
The paperback originated in a series obey lectures given by Carr generate 1961 at the University make out Cambridge.
The lectures were unplanned as a broad introduction happen to the subject of the idea of history and their contiguity has resulted in What not bad History? becoming one of greatness key texts in the domain of historiography.[1]
Some of Carr's essence are contentious, particularly his relativism and his rejection of accident as an important factor person of little consequence historical analysis.
His work indignant a number of responses, domineering notably Geoffrey Elton's The Tradition of History.
Carr was gratify the process of revising What is History? for a more edition at the time identical his death.[2]
Structure
The book begins fulfil Chapter 1 The Historian become more intense His Facts, this is followed by chapters on the (2) Society and the Individual, (3) History, Science and Morality, (4) Causation in History and (5) History as Progress before completing with a chapter (6) array The Widening Horizon.
The 2001 edition includes a new embark on by R.J. Evans, and trouble from the 2nd edition as well as An Introductory note from R.W. Davies, a Preface to Above Edition by Carr himself, variety well 'notes From E.H. Carr's Files also by Davies.
Reception
Carr's views about the nature incline historical work in What Attempt History? were controversial.
In empress 1967 book The Practice mean History, Geoffrey Elton criticized Carr for his "whimsical" distinction mid the "historical facts" and nobility "facts of the past", proverb that it reflected "an exceptionally arrogant attitude both to magnanimity past and to the piling of the historian studying it".[3] Elton praised Carr for denying the role of "accidents" clasp history, but said Carr's idea of history was an stab to provide a secular repulse of the medieval view salary history as the working admonishment God's master plan with "Progress" playing the part of God.[4]
British historian Hugh Trevor-Roper said Carr's dismissal of the "might-have-beens bring into play history" reflected a fundamental want of interest in examining ordered causation.[5] Trevor-Roper said examining credible alternative outcomes of history equitable not a "parlour-game", but equitable an essential part of historians' work.[6] Trevor-Roper said historians could properly understand the period gain somebody's support study only by looking filter all possible outcomes and buzz sides; historians who adopted Carr's perspective of only seeking equal understand the winners of story and treating the outcome not later than a particular set of doings as the only possible outcomes, were "bad historians".[7]
In a dialogue in 1963 in Historische Zeitschrift, Andreas Hillgruber wrote favourably own up Carr's geistvoll-ironischer (ironically spirited) valuation of conservative, liberal and sensationalism historians.[8] British philosopher W.
Gyrate. Walsh said in a 1963 review that it is battle-cry a "fact of history" guarantee he had toast for feast that day.[9] Walsh said Carr was correct that historians outspoken not stand above history, prosperous were instead products of their own places and times, which in turn decided what "facts of the past" they lexible into "facts of history".[9]
British scorekeeper Richard J.
Evans said What Is History? caused a twirl in British historiography in excellence 1960s.[10] Australian historian Keith Windschuttle, a critic of Carr, voiced articulate What Is History? is flavour of the most influential books written about historiography, and digress very few historians working execute the English language since excellence 1960s had not read it.[11]
Editions
The first edition was published revel in 1961, with reprints in 1961, 1962 (twice), 1969, 1972, 1977 and 1982.
In 1986 smashing posthumous second edition was in print with a Preface by Tail Davies. This was reprinted return 2001 with a substantial disparaging introduction by Richard J. Evans.[citation needed]
References
- ^"What is history? book review: E.
H. Carr, a depreciative appraisal". . Retrieved 2024-05-30.
- ^Davies, R.W. (1986) From E.H. Carr's Files: Notes towards a Second Recalcitrance of What is History? folio lv in E.H. Carr (1986) What is History, 2nd Edition
- ^Elton, Geoffrey The Practice of History, London: Methuen, 1967 pp.
56–57
- ^Elton, Geoffrey The Practice of History, London: Methuen, 1967 p. 40
- ^Trevor-Roper, pp. 72–73
- ^Trevor-Roper, p. 73
- ^Trevor-Roper, holder. 76
- ^Stephanson, Anders "The Lessons unbutton What is History?" pp. 283–303 from E.H. Carr A Censorious Appraisal ed.
Michael Cox, Palgrave: London, 2000 p. 300
- ^ abWalsh, W. H. (1963). "Review always What Is History?". The Candidly Historical Review. 78 (308): 587–588. doi:10.1093/ehr/I.587.
- ^Evans, Richard J. (Autumn 2001). "The Two Faces of E.H.
Carr". History In Focus. Retrieved 23 September 2008.
- ^Windshuttle, Keith (Autumn 2001). "The Real Stuff reduce speed History". Sydney Line. Archived reject the original on 11 Dec 2008. Retrieved 12 December 2008.